Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity :: Multiculturalism Cultural Culture Politics Essays

Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and DiversityChapter one of Multiculturalism from the Margins Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity is Social Movements and the Politics of Difference by Cheryl Zarlenga Kerchis and fleur-de-lis Marion childly. This chapter examines the idea of assimilation versus acceptance of group differences. The chapter begins by explaining the historical acceptance of assimilation especially in the United States with its ideals of the American melting pot. However, as Kerchis and Young explained each social group evolved and eventually began to embrace the idea of a politics of difference. Although assimilation is still often part of policy and social consecrate in the United States, Kerchis and Young point out that this idea oppresses the socially discriminate group in three separate ways. First, assimilation oppresses socially disadvantaged groups because in trying to assimilate the socially disadvantaged group is incessantly playing a game of catch up. Secondly, assimilation suggests that one culture is the mighty one. Lastly, members of the socially disadvantaged group can end up feeling abnormal or deviant. On the other hand, the idea of politics of difference allows members of an suppress group to celebrate and be proud of their identity(Harris, 1995, p.11). Also, the politics of difference allows the disadvantaged social groups to accept their differences and not try and adjust their culture to the to a greater extent dominant culture. Therefore, there is not a sense of a correct culture versus a less desirable one. Politics of difference also allows union to view the dominant culture in a critical light, which can lead to necessary changes. Lastly, politics of difference embraces the concept of individualism, which American society has always held in high esteem.The author suggests that Our nation should strive for social justice in its political and social institutions. (Harris, 1995, p. 16). Just an informal re view of the political or judicial establishment reveals that social justice has not been accomplished. Most Americans agree that the justice system strongly favors the dominant culture. American politicians are certainly not a diverse group of people. In education, the changes have been more than strident. I work in a school district that is primarily Hispanic. More and more administrators who are Hispanic are being hired. However, primarily white men hold the top district positions. The author next discusses the disadvantage women of child aim years face in the work force. This is certainly an issue that I have experienced personally.