Constitutional Law and its Contemporary Challenges: Speech, Search and

Constitutional natural law was created as the chosen bureau to preserve the United States of America Constitution, ratified by Congress in 1783, in respect to its meanings, use, and enforcement, for free government, and equal justice under the integrity for all Americans. However, as times and generations have passed, the U.S. Constitution remains the imperative law of the land. Among the most contemporary and controversial elements argon the challenges of evolving interpretations of the freedom of speech, and hunt stock warrants, which have both had a major impact on society. In particular, we explore speech not protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution, as well as some circumstances when a search warrant is not required for a valid search. A conclusion is worn and outlined based on research conducted to offer a aphoristic in-depth observation of the above topics. FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMSThe First (1st) Amendment of the United States (U.S.) Constitution, ratifie d celestial latitude 15, 1791, guarantees to all Americans regardless of age, ethnicity, disability, faith, or gender, the freedom of speech, freedom of press, the obligation to assemble, the right to peacefully assemble, and the right to petition Congress (Government) for a redress of grievances (Kanovitz, 2010). However, as these types of speech are protected by the 1st Amendment, there are other kinds of speech that are not. The framers of the 1st Amendment intended for this amendment to be freehanded as to allow the amendment room to adapt to future changes in societal diversities as we live today (Kanovitz, 2010). In these protected rights are steady foundations that secures the opportunity to openly share ideas, thoughts, and various differences in points of view, encouraging interaction... ...merican soil, the foreland remains as to how much privacy Americans really possess. Yes, security in the person and home is still at the discretion of law enforcement, further how far will the government reach in what seems to be an detailed effort to gain total control over what the Constitution defines as a free society? This, and many other questions remain nonreciprocal today, but it must be remembered that this is a government of, for, and by the people, not a dictatorship that it has come to be in todays world. Works CitedGardner, Bryan A. (2009). In Blacks Law Dictionary. St. Paul, Minnesota West / Thomson Reuters.Kanovitz, J. R. (2010). Constitutional Law (12th ed.). (E. R. Ebben, Ed.) New Providence, NJ, U.S.A. Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., LexisNexis Gorup.Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868 (Supreme Court June 10, 1968).