Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity :: Multiculturalism Cultural Culture Politics Essays

Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and DiversityChapter one of Multiculturalism from the Margins Non-Dominant Voices on Difference and Diversity is sociable Movements and the Politics of Difference by Cheryl Zarlenga Kerchis and Iris Marion Young. This chapter examines the idea of assimilation versus acceptance of group diversitys. The chapter begins by explaining the historical acceptance of assimilation especially in the get together States with its ideals of the American melting pot. However, as Kerchis and Young explained each social group evolved and eventually began to embrace the idea of a politics of difference. Although assimilation is still much part of policy and social practice in the United States, Kerchis and Young point out that this idea oppresses the socially disadvantaged group in triad separate ways. First, assimilation oppresses socially disadvantaged groups because in trying to assimilate the socially disadvantaged group is always playing a game of haul up. S econdly, assimilation suggests that one culture is the right one. Lastly, members of the socially disadvantaged group can end up feeling abnormal or deviant. On the another(prenominal) hand, the idea of politics of difference allows members of an oppressed group to celebrate and be proud of their identity(Harris, 1995, p.11). Also, the politics of difference allows the disadvantaged social groups to accept their differences and not try and adjust their culture to the more preponderant culture. Therefore, there is not a sense of a correct culture versus a less plummy one. Politics of difference also allows society to view the dominant culture in a critical light, which can lead to necessary changes. Lastly, politics of difference embraces the concept of individualism, which American society has always held in high esteem.The creator suggests that Our nation should strive for social justice in its political and social institutions. (Harris, 1995, p. 16). scarcely an informal revi ew of the political or judicial establishment reveals that social justice has not been accomplished. Most Americans agree that the justice system strongly favors the dominant culture. American politicians are certainly not a diverse group of people. In education, the changes have been more strident. I work in a tame district that is primarily Hispanic. More and more administrators who are Hispanic are being hired. However, primarily white men hold the top district positions. The author next discusses the disadvantage women of child bearing years face in the work force. This is certainly an issue that I have experienced personally.